National Archives at Kansas City, Missouri

Displaying 97 - 108 of 789

U.S. vs. Sadie Murphy, G. W. Ferguson, Isador Ritz, et al.: Indictment

Indictment in Criminal Case No. 14118: United States vs. Sadie Humphrey, G. W. Ferguson, Isador Ritz, L. A. Radcliffe, Rosemary Comiskey, Frank Murray, John Shyne, and Opal Lillis, defendants. The defendants were charged with conspiring to impede citizens' right to vote and have that vote truthfully counted in the 1st Precinct of the 2nd Ward during the November 3, 1936 election.

U.S. vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, et al.: Recognizance for Appearance

Recognizances for appearance in court for Criminal Case No. 14113: United States vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, alias Bill Irwin, Norman John Nyhuse, alias Norman Nyhus, Clarissa Cox, Ethel Thompson, and Nana May Hunter, Defendants. These documents completed by the defendants attest that they will appear before the court to defend the charges imposed upon them.

U.S. vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, et al.: Judgment and Commitment

Judgment and commitment of Russell Lee Thompson in Criminal Case No. 14113: United States vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, alias Bill Irwin, Norman John Nyhuse, alias Norman Nyhus, Clarissa Cox, Ethel Thompson, and Nana May Hunter, Defendants. Thompson was sentenced to six months in jail and fined $300.00.

U.S. vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, et al.: Indictment

Indictment for Criminal Case No. 14113: United States vs. Russell Lee Thompson, James G. Gildea, Arthur Carl Perry, William Irwin, alias Bill Irwin, Norman John Nyhuse, alias Norman Nyhus, Clarissa Cox, Ethel Thompson, and Nana May Hunter, Defendants. In this indictment, the defendants are charged with voter fraud during the national election on November 3, 1936. These defendants were in charge of recording votes for the 24th Precinct of the 12th Ward located in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri.

U.S. vs. Rose Costanza: Verdict

Verdict in the trial of Criminal Case No. 8838: United States vs. Rose Costanza, defendant. Costanza was found not guilty in the first, second, and third counts, related to operating a distillery, and guilty of the fourth count, related to the possession of alcohol. The verdicts are signed off on by the foreman of the jury.

U.S. vs. Rose Costanza: Report of Trial

Report of trial for Criminal Case No. 8388: United States vs. Rose Costanza and Joseph Costanza, defendants. The document summarizes events of the case, including the defendants' arrest on November 26, 1927, Joe Costanza's discharge from the case, the witnesses who appeared, and the attorneys appearing on each side. Commissioner George D. Beardsley held that Rose Costanza was "probably guilty," ordered a recognizance of $2000.00, and ordered her to appear in the District Court on April 23, 1928.

U.S. vs. Rose Costanza: Indictment

Indictment in Criminal Case No. 8388: United States vs. Rose Costanza, defendant. The defendant was charged with, in Count I, operating a distillery "with the intent to defraud the United States of America of the tax on the spirits"; in Count II, making, possession, and fermenting "a quantity of mash fit for distillation... to wit, 120 gallons" outside of an authorized distillery; in Count III, manufacturing "for beverage purposes" six gallons of whiskey; and in Count IV, possessing six gallons of whiskey "for beverage purposes."

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Receipt of Fine Payment

Receipt of fine payment for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Clerk A. L. Arnold certifies that the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri has received O'Malley's fine of $5000.00.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Order and Memorandum

Order detailing O'Malley's probation for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Judge Merrill E. Otis outlines the details of O'Malley's probation followed by a memorandum that clarifies custody and parole conditions of the defendant.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Notes Concerning Sentence of Defendant

Considerations for the decision of sentence for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Judge Merrill E. Otis reviews the sentence that he imposed upon T. J. Pendergast in Criminal Case No. 14458, so that Otis may more accurately sentence Robert Emmet O'Malley in the present case.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Motion for Bill of Particulars

Motion for bill of particulars for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for O'Malley pray the court to furnish details as to "when, where, from whom, in what form and for what consideration defendant is alleged to have received" income from the Missouri Fire Insurance Rate Litigation. They request this information so that they may more adequately prepare a defense for the defendant.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Judgement and Commitment

Judgement and commitment for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. After his plea of guilty, O'Malley is sentenced to a total of one year and one day in a federal penitentiary, followed by three years of probation. O'Malley is also fined $5000.00. The document then lists the details of the defendant's probation.