National Archives at Kansas City, Missouri

Displaying 49 - 60 of 789

U.S. vs. Thomas J. Pendergast: From Daniel M. Lyons to Merrill E. Otis

Letter from Pardon Attorney Daniel M. Lyons to Judge Merrill E. Otis concerning Criminal Case No. 14458: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Defendant. In this letter, Lyons requests Judge Otis's view on the prospect of executive clemency for T. J. Pendergast's remaining parole.

U.S. vs. Thomas J. Pendergast: Capias

Capias for Thomas J. Pendergast in Criminal Case No. 14567: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Defendant. This capias commands H. L. Dillingham, U.S. Marshal, to arrest Thomas J. Pendergast for income tax fraud. His bond for appearance is $10,000.

U.S. vs. Thomas J. Pendergast: Capias

Capias for Thomas J. Pendergast in Criminal Case No. 14458: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Defendant. This capias commands H. L. Dillingham, U.S. Marshal, to arrest Thomas J. Pendergast for income tax fraud. His bond for appearance is $10,000.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Subpoena Duces Tecum

Subpoena duces tecum for John J. Campbell in Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. This document orders John J. Campbell to testify in court on November 18, 1940 and to bring as evidence "records as manager of the custodian's files of the funds impounded in the Missouri Fire Insurance Rate Litigation."

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Subpoena Duces Tecum

Subpoena duces tecum for W. T. Kemper in Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. This document orders W. T. Kemper, Jr. of the Commerce Trust Company, Kansas City, Missouri, to testify in court on November 18, 1940 and to bring as evidence "records as custodian of the impounded insurance premiums under order of the U. S. Court for the Western District of Missouri."

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Separate Plea in Abatement of Defendant, T. J. Pendergast

Separate plea in abatement of defendant, T. J. Pendergast for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for Pendergast ask the court to remove said defendant from the indictment based upon the evidence provided within.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Separate Plea in Abatement of Defendant, T. J. Pendergast

Separate plea in abatement of defendant, T. J. Pendergast for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for Pendergast ask the court to remove said defendant from the indictment based upon the evidence provided within.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Separate Plea in Abatement of Defendant, R. E. O'Malley

Separate plea in abatement of defendant, R. E. O'Malley for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for O'Malley ask the court to remove said defendant from the indictment based upon the evidence provided within.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Separate Plea in Abatement of Defendant, A. L. McCormack

Separate plea in abatement of defendant, A. L. McCormack for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for McCormack ask the court to remove said defendant from the indictment based upon the evidence provided within.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Separate Plea in Abatement of Defendant, A. L. McCormack

Separate plea in abatement of defendant, A. L. McCormack for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for McCormack ask the court to remove said defendant from the indictment based upon the evidence provided within.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Recognizances for Appearance

Two recognizances for appearance in court for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In these two documents, Thomas J. Pendergast and Robert Emmet O'Malley assert that he will appear before court to answer for charges of "interferring with the orderly and lawful functioning of the Judiciary Department."

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Recognizances for Appearance

Two Recognizances for appearance in court for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In these documents, Thomas J. Pendergast and Robert Emmet O'Malley assert that he will appear before court to answer for charges of "corruptly obstructing the due administration of justice in the case of the American Insurance Company vs. the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of Missouri."