O'Malley, R. Emmet

Displaying 25 - 36 of 110

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Demurrer of Defendant, T. J. Pendergast

Demurrer of defendant, T. J. Pendergast for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for Pendergast outline their objections to the indictment in five separate points.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Demurrer of Defendant, T. J. Pendergast

Demurrer of defendant, T. J. Pendergast for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for Pendergast outline their objection to the indictment in six separate points.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Demurrer of Defendant, R. E. O'Malley

Separate demurrer of defendant, Robert Emmet O'Malley for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for O'Malley outline their objections to the indictment in 14 separate points.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Certificate of the Clerk

Certificate of the Clerk for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. A. L. Arnold certifies that because of personal bias and prejudice towards defendant T. J. Pendergast, Judge Merrill E. Otis is removed from the case and replaced with Judge Archibald K. Gardner.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Capias

Capias for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. This capias commands H. L. Dillingham, U.S. Marshal, to arrest the three defendants. Dillingham certifies on the back of the document that he procured Pendergast and O'Malley, but was unable to find McCormack.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Capias

Capias for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. This capias commands H. L. Dillingham, U.S. Marshal, to arrest the three defendants. Dillingham certifies on the back of the document that he procured Pendergast and O'Malley, but was unable to find McCormack.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Affidavit of Bias and Prejudice

Affidavit of bias and prejudice for Criminal Case No. 14937: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this affidavit, Pendergast claims that Judge Merrill E. Otis has a personal bias and prejudice against the defendant. Since Otis is also a judge in the cases Pendergast has illegal involvement in, Pendergast claims a personal bias.

U.S. vs. T. J. Pendergast, R. E. O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack: Affidavit of Bias and Prejudice

Affidavit of bias and prejudice for Criminal Case No. 14912: United States vs. Thomas J. Pendergast, Robert Emmet O'Malley, and A. L. McCormack, Defendant. In this affidavit, Pendergast claims that Judge Merrill E. Otis has a personal bias and prejudice against the defendant. Since Otis is also a judge in the cases Pendergast has illegal involvement in, Pendergast claims a personal bias.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Receipt of Fine Payment

Receipt of fine payment for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Clerk A. L. Arnold certifies that the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri has received O'Malley's fine of $5000.00.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Order and Memorandum

Order detailing O'Malley's probation for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Judge Merrill E. Otis outlines the details of O'Malley's probation followed by a memorandum that clarifies custody and parole conditions of the defendant.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Notes Concerning Sentence of Defendant

Considerations for the decision of sentence for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, Judge Merrill E. Otis reviews the sentence that he imposed upon T. J. Pendergast in Criminal Case No. 14458, so that Otis may more accurately sentence Robert Emmet O'Malley in the present case.

U.S. vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley: Motion for Bill of Particulars

Motion for bill of particulars for Criminal Case No. 14459: United States vs. Robert Emmet O'Malley, Defendant. In this document, attorneys for O'Malley pray the court to furnish details as to "when, where, from whom, in what form and for what consideration defendant is alleged to have received" income from the Missouri Fire Insurance Rate Litigation. They request this information so that they may more adequately prepare a defense for the defendant.