U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri

Displaying 13 - 24 of 479

Indictment for Criminal Case No. 12697: United States vs. Charles Arthur Floyd and Adam Richetti, Defendants. They are charged with the theft of an automobile in connection with the Union Station Massacre.

Capias for Criminal Case No. 12697: United States vs. Charles Arthur Floyd and Adam Richetti, Defendants. This document orders law enforcement to apprehend Charles "Pretty Boy" Floyd and Adam Richetti.

Capias for Criminal Case No. 12697: United States vs. Charles Arthur Floyd and Adam Richetti, Defendants. This document orders law enforcement to apprehend Adam Richetti.

Memorandum opinion in the civil case of Lucile Bluford vs. S. W. Canada, registrar at the University of Missouri. Canada's lawyers entered a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the facts don't support the claim.

Summons and complaint in the civil case of Lucile Bluford vs. S. W. Canada, registrar at the University of Missouri. Canada is ordered to answer Bluford's complaint, directed to her lawyer Carl R. Johnson, within 20 days.

Letter from defense attorney Rubey M. Hulen to the U.S. District Court clerk in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. Hulen writes to enclose a form of order to extend time for pleas and filing an answer in the case, which he says he has discussed with Judge John Collet, and asks that Collet sign the order.

Court order in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. Judge John Collet orders that, on application of the defendant, time is extended for the defendant to answer answer and plead to the original complaint.

Verdict in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. Jury foreman Charles E. Abbott announces the jury finds against the plaintiff and for the defendant.

Jury lists in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. The list shows 42 potential jurors listing names, counties of residence, and occupations. Several names are stricken through.

Jury list in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. The list shows 42 potential jurors listing names, counties of residence, and occupations. Several names are stricken through.

Letter from defense attorney William S. Hogsett to the U.S. District Court clerk in Civil Case No. 128: Lucile Bluford v. S.W. Canada. Hogsett writes that he is enclosing a defendant's motion to require the plaintiff to make changes to their statement under Rule 12(e).

Subpoena duces tecum in Civil Action No. 42: Lucile Bluford v. S.W.

Pages

KANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY | DIGITAL HISTORY